Skip to main content
For lean litigation teams

AI-assisted litigation support, checked by people.

We support matters in federal, state, and local courts and administrative proceedings. Send us a task. We scope it on a 30-minute call and confirm the delivery date when we accept the scope.

Book a 30-minute call See the technology →
◈
Citation Validator
Citation, quotation, and record checks
Illustrative brief excerpt
In Henderson v. Apex Holdings, 482 F.3d 219 (2d Cir. 2024), the court held that a defendant's "good faith reliance" on internal compliance reviews bars summary judgment when the disputed conduct occurred over a multi-year span.
See example results
Sourced
Source references for the citations we check
Checked
Citation-checking reports with sources and findings
Scoped
Per project or on retainer
Yours
Your counsel makes the legal calls and signs
How we work

Intake → system draft → human review → your decision

Date set at scoping Rush available Encrypted environments Conflict-checked
1
Intake

You bring the work. We scope it on a 30-minute call.

2
System draft

Our system does the first pass on your records.

3
Human review

Our team checks the draft against the sources.

4
Lawyer decision

You ask for revisions or take it toward filing.

Delivered on the date we confirm at scoping.

The AI does the volume. People check the work.

Our team reviews litigation-support work before delivery using the source checks agreed for the assignment. Your counsel makes the legal calls.

AI does
First-pass document review
Pattern detection in datasets
Draft generation
Citation lookup
Humans do
Review against the agreed scope
Questions flagged for counsel
Citation verification
Final deliverable signoff
Your case files

Organize your case record

Start with your emails, drives, scanned productions, transcripts, and spreadsheets. We organize it into a searchable, usable case file so your team can find what matters and move the matter forward.

Tell us about your records →
Citation checking example

Compare draft citations with their sources.

The illustrative results show fabricated cases, phantom quotes, and verified citations. Discuss your draft and sources with us to scope a citation check.

Discuss citation checking →
Illustrative results · 4 citations
2 issues found
Henderson v. Apex Holdings, 482 F.3d 219 (2d Cir. 2024)
No matching case in any reporter. Reporter volume predates the cited year.
Fabricated
"facially inadequate," Rule 56(c)(4)
Quoted language does not appear in the cited rule.
Phantom quote
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986)
Citation and pin cite verified against source.
Verified
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, 477 U.S. 242 (1986)
Citation and pin cite verified against source.
Verified
What we do

Litigation support, per project or on retainer

All services →
Service 01
Discovery and production

Written discovery, document production and privilege logs, so your team stays on strategy.

Service 02
Pleadings and motions

Research-backed drafts for the pleadings and motions that move your case. Citation and record checks agreed with your team.

Service 03
Deposition support

Exhibit-linked outlines, question guides, and preparation packages. Deposition-day support is agreed in scope.

Trial support & prep → Joint appendix for appeals → Rule 1006 summaries → Verification and validation → Products you can buy without a full engagement →
AI-assisted preparation

How we use AI in litigation support

We use technology to organize records, retrieve passages, and prepare drafts for review.

01 Natural Language Processing Helps identify terms, topics, and passages for review.
02 Finding related passages Search for passages related to the issues and concepts in the record.
03 Vector search Retrieve passages by their relationship to a search query, alongside keyword search.
04 Large language models Assists with summaries and drafts for review against the source materials.
05 Named entity recognition Identifies and categorizes people, organizations, and locations across the record automatically.
Security

Our commitment to security and compliance

We use encrypted infrastructure to handle the documents and data provided for an engagement.

Data is encrypted at rest and in transit. See our privacy policy for how we collect and use information.

Encrypted at rest Encrypted in transit Human-verified

What you get back

Rule 1006 summary exhibitXLSX + PDFSource references and calculation steps
Privilege logXLSXDocument comparisons agreed in scope
Joint appendixPDF, bookmarkedRecord and formatting checks agreed in scope
Deposition summary setDOCXReferences to the passages summarized
From counsel

"For the first time in over 20 years, I finally feel like we have a level playing field with the defense—thanks to Legal1Up."

Stephani Ayers
Deputy Litigation Director, Government Accountability Project
Washington, DC

"Legal1Up's deposition exhibit and questions guides have opened a whole new wonderful world in my practice."

Thad M. Guyer
T.M. Guyer & Friends, PC
Legal1Up client and advisor

Need help with your next matter?

Submit a task and we'll scope it on a 30-minute call. We run a conflict check and confirm the scope, quote, and delivery date before starting.

Book a 30-minute call